By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty

I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.

Loyal to Liberty ...

Gratitude to our Most Holy and Powerful God!  And thank you to all who continually pray for the truth.

I have a hunch that this is a minute order or something that restates the trial dates. That doesn’t mean he’s made a ruling on the defense’s motion to dismiss.

I’ll find out shortly.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1
Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009
Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL. V. BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA, ET AL. Present: The
Honorable
David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge
Kristee Hopkins Debbie Gale N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Orly Taitz
Gary Kreep
David DeJute, AUSA
Roger West, AUSA
Proceedings: 1. MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE 2. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken under submission.
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final. Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
3 : 21 01 Initials of Preparer kh
Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 81 Filed 10/05/2009 Page 1 of 1

Are you sure of this link?

This is what my computer said to me when I clicked it:

Reported Attack Site!

This web site at www.orlytaitzesq.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.

Attack sites try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.

Some attack sites intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.

Could you embed video or just copy and paste some of the text?  I'm leary of this warning, which I have never seen before.

At the Sept. 8th hearing, Judge Carter said they would only have a scheduling conference IF he ruled not to dismiss.  He said Motion's To Dismiss (MTD) are rejected [96% -] 99% of the time.  

Judge Carter was pretty clear in Sept. that dismissing the case was unlikely.  The people who were in attendance Oct. 5th seemed to be surprised by the judge's questions Oct. 5th, in light of his comments, on Sept. 8th.

Based on the judge's comments that scheduling only occurs if MTD is rejected, and the fact that the schedule has been finalized ... I tend to suspect that the trial will go forward with at least some of the plaintiffs and defendants on at least some of the issues raised.

That's just a guess.

Regardless ... I look forward to enthusiastic confirmation of same.

Please, no links to Orly Taitz' website. It is infected, and she repeatedly refused to accept advice from experts who told her exactly what and how.

I would strongly advise people not to go there.

Emergency Ex-Parte Motion for Relief From Stay of Discovery [Orly Taitz]

oilforimmigration.org

Emergency Ex-Parte Motion for Relief From Stay of Discovery Posted on October 8th, 2009 by David-Crockett Updating Taitz files Motion for Relief, in Barnett vs. Obama

Taitz files Motion for Relief, in Barnett vs. Obama Posted on October 8th, 2009 by David-Crockett The Post & Email published

ACTION FOLLOWS MINUTE ORDER FINALIZING DATES, DISAGREEMENT WITH DEFENSE ON PROCEEDING IN DISCOVERY by John Charlton

(Oct. 7, 2007) — At approximately 2:30 PM this afternoon, Eastern Time, The Post & Email learned that Judge Carter had ordered the dates finalized in the case Captain Pamela Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al..

The finalizing of the dates for the trial is normal procedure when the Court has decided a trial will be held; thus, the order contained in the Minute Order is clear indication that either the Motion to Dismiss will be in part or wholly denied, or that Judge David O. Carter has decided to reserve judgment on the Motion to Dismiss until after the jury verdict in the trial — which is done in some cases.

In response to the exchange between Plaintiff’s counsel and Defense Counsel on the Minute Order and its significance, Dr. Orly Taitz, esq. has just filed, minutes ago, a Motion for Relief from the Stay for Discovery.

Forceful Exchange between Plaintiffs and Defense, earlier today The reason for filing is explained in the accompanying exhibits, which detail the conversation between parties moments after the Minute Order was published. First Mr. Charles E. Lincoln III, on behalf of Dr. Orly Taitz, communicated the following to the Defense’s counsels: