AIPNews.com  |  About AIP  |  Platform  |  Personal Affiliation  |  Contribute Search  |  Inbox  |  My Settings  |  Log-in  

America's Independent Party

Securing the Blessings of Liberty

Featured Forum:

America's Forum at AIPNews - 'We are the Media!'

All posts by date

(Must affiliate to post)


America, they're lying to you - Congress doesn't have the Constitutional authority - BOB BAILEY
::
   AIP National Issues Affiliates -> Resurrect the Tenth Amendment

Article I Section 8, Federalist No. 45, and the Tenth Amendment - the usurpation of power by Congress

AIPNews.com
by Bob Bailey

It is difficult to understand how our national leaders can pass many of the laws they do given they have no authority to do so. It is also difficult to understand how everything seems to have been turned upside down -- what use to mean one thing now means the opposite. Well, here are the facts regarding the intent of the Constitution and how politicians attempt to convince us they are operating within its confines.

US Constitution
Article I - The Legislative Branch
Section 8 - Powers of Congress

17 Sep 1797

Taxing and Spending Clause – Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution is sometimes referred to as the "The Taxing and Spending Clause". It's intent is to grant Congress the power to impose taxes for paying for three general areas: (1) pay off the Debt incurred during the war for independence, (2) provide for national Defense, and (3) provide for the general Welfare. The first paragraph reads as follows:

(first paragraph) The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

General Welfare Clause – The "general Welfare" clause in this paragraph is what the leaders in the central government use to grant themselves power to do whatever they want. However, James Madison pointed out that if this is what was intended, there would have been no need to enumerate the limiting powers listed in this same article. Madison was very clear that the power to tax and spend was confined only to the enumerated powers listed in the US Constitution. As has been pointed out, the general Welfare clause is a reference to one of the three areas where power was granted to the federal government with regard to taxing and spending, and those powers are enumerated between the first and last paragraphs of Article I, Section 8.

The first paragraph, therefore, is clearly an outline of what is to follow, which are the enumerated powers granted to the US Congress.

Necessary and Proper Clause – The "necessary and proper" clause is the other clause the central government uses to grant themselves power. This clause is found in the last paragraph:

(last paragraph) To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Here again, if the intent had been to grant the federal government unlimited powers there would have been no need to list the powers granted to the federal government, either in Article I, Section 8, or anywhere else in the Constitution. The intent of this clause is to provide the federal government the means to carry out the powers that were granted to it in the Constitution. For example, Section 8 grants the power to the federal government "To establish Post Offices and Post Roads". With regards to establishing Post Offices, it is "necessary and proper" that the government build post office buildings in order to carry out this function.

The last paragraph is clearly a clarification regarding the authority granted Congress as listed in the enumerated powers, and only the enumerated powers.

Commerce clause – Before leaving Article I, Section 8, the Commerce clause should also be discussed. The Commerce clause is an enumerated power listed in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3. The clause states:

[The Congress shall have power] To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;

This clause is often paired with the Necessary and Proper Clause in order to take a broad, expansive perspective of the Commerce clause. However, several facts must be taken into account.  By definition "commerce" is the commercial exchange of goods and services including the marketing, purchasing, and transporting those goods. Production, on the other hand, is not part of the process of the commercial exchange of goods and services. "Among the several States" means activity occurring in more that one State. “To regulate" means the power to prescribe rules under which commerce shall be transacted. Taken together, this means Congress can not regulate matters that are completely internal to a State. Congress also can not interfere with things that are not necessary for executing its enumerated powers.

The way usurpers in the Congress have used the Commerce clause is to argue that commerce should include any gainful activity; which would of course give power to the central government to control the entire economy. Some have even proposed the Commerce clause is to deal with any human interaction including speech. The problem with these ideas is that they are inconsistent with the thinking of those who participated in the creation our Constitution.

US Constitution
Tenth Amendment

15 December 1791

When determining the intent of the US Constitution with regards to broad versus limited power there is the Tenth Amendment. This Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which were proposed by the First Congress to address the concern that the Constitution, as drafted, would open the way to tyranny by the central government. The Tenth Amendment reads:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

This Amendment addresses the powers retained by the States and the people. It makes clear the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers granted in the Constitution and restates how the Constitution's principle of federalism is designed; that is, by providing that powers not granted to the National government nor prohibited to the States are reserved to the States or the People.


The Federalist Papers
Essay No. 45

[James Madison]
26 Jan 1788

Quoting The Federalist No. 45:

  “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part; be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people; and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.
  The operations of the federal government will be most extensive and important in times of war and danger, those of the State governments in times of peace and security.”

Federalist No. 45 makes clear the distinction between the external powers granted to the federal government from the domestic powers reserved to the States. The Federal government's power pertains, for the most part, to external or foreign affairs. The State government's power pertains to the life, liberty or property of the people of the several States. Again, Congress was not granted broad authority under the general Welfare clause. Therefore, Congress does not have the authority to fund domestic social programs under the guise of the general welfare.

Examples of Unconstitutional Taxing and Spending

Congress often seeks to exercise its powers which are not authorized in the Constitution by offering or encouraging the States to implement national programs consistent with national minimum standards; a system known as cooperative federalism. One example of the exercise of this device is to condition allocation of federal funding where certain State laws do not conform to federal guidelines. For example, federal educational funds may not be accepted without implementation of special education programs in compliance with IDEA. Similarly, the nationwide State 55 mph speed limit, .08 legal blood alcohol limit, and the nationwide state 21-year drinking age were imposed through this method; the States would lose highway funding if they refused to pass such laws. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_amendment

Another easy to understand example of how Congress usurps its authority is the funding of local or particular projects comes from an article written at the Tenth Amendment Center. At the present time, Congress imposes a general gasoline tax of 18.4 cents per gallon throughout the United States. When Congress writes a spending bill and a powerful member of Congress wants to buy some votes from the folks back home, he places an earmark in the legislation to have a 3 million dollar bicycle trail built in his home State or congressional district. The money for the project is appropriated from the general fund of the United States where the gasoline taxes were deposited with other taxes of a general nature. Thus, taxes from the general fund were used to finance a local or particular project within an individual State. This is unconstitutional. The project was not for the [general] welfare of the States in their united capacity. This is unconstitutional. Since building bicycle trails in the States is “not authorised in the Constitution, either expressly or by fair implication,” the appropriation failed this test and is unconstitutional. In other words, Congress cannot impose a general tax throughout the United States, put the money in the general fund of the United States, appropriate money from the general fund of the United States, and then spend the money for a local or particular project. (from the Tenth Amendment Center http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/04/congress-a-wealth-eating-virus/ )

Conclusion

In summary, Congress can only tax and spend in order to: (1) pay the debt, (2) provide for the common defense of the Nation, or (3) for the general Welfare of the nation; and if for the general Welfare, then it must be governed by BOTH the following:
a. Authorized in the Constitution.
b. Be general and apply to all; not for local or particular projects.

Since every spending bill passed by Congress for the general Welfare of the nation must meet both of these requirements to be constitutional, and very few of the spending bills by the central government can meet these standards, then members of Congress have usurped their authority.



Posted 2009-08-20 8:16 AM (#20902) By: rbailey


Also posted HERE.
Posted 2009-08-20 8:46 AM (#20905 - in reply to #20902) By: Editor


From the America's Independent Party Platform:

Restoring limited government

We seek to restore the intended balance between the three separate branches of our government, and to strictly limit government to the Enumerated Powers granted and expressed by the will of the people of the United States in our Constitution.

All existing functions of the Executive branch that are outside of those Enumerated Powers must be eliminated.

All spending and regulation by the Legislative branch that lies outside the Enumerated Powers must cease.

Judges who attempt to legislate from the bench, or who abandon the clear principles of our Constitution, must be checked if liberty and justice are to prevail in our society once again.

We demand a return to adherence to the provisions of the Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

 

Posted 2009-08-20 8:50 AM (#20906 - in reply to #20905) By: Editor


Bob, this is a masterful piece of work. Congratulations!

Folks need to get this out EVERYWHERE!

 


Posted 2009-08-20 9:15 AM (#20910 - in reply to #20902) By: EternalVigilance


Posted 2009-08-20 9:29 AM (#20911 - in reply to #20902) By: EternalVigilance


To: EternalVigilance
 
“With respect to the two words ‘general welfare’, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.” - James Madison, letter to James Robertson.

Also, some interesting links.

Madison's veto of spending bill

The General Welfare Clause

Constitution Day
 
35 posted on Thursday, August 20, 2009 12:15:34 PM by MissouriConservative
Posted 2009-08-20 10:24 AM (#20916 - in reply to #20911) By: EternalVigilance


Other AIPNews.com articles on this subject.

James Madison said that 'general welfare' not prescription for unlimited government
http://www.aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=7240&posts=1

Edited by rbailey 2009-08-20 1:23 PM
Posted 2009-08-20 1:19 PM (#20935 - in reply to #20916) By: rbailey


Bob, what a great article!  Sources cited and everything!  I will give you and AIP credit, but I'm going to copy and paste into my 20 different blogs.

Mary Ann Hartzler
AIP of Kansas

Posted 2009-08-20 1:41 PM (#20936 - in reply to #20935) By: MaryAnnH


To: Rodamala; Goreknowshowtocheat; traditional1; Steelfish; EternalVigilance
 
To our blackrobes, case law trumps the Constitution.

1942 Wickard v. Filburn. This decision blew the commerce clause to pieces. Farmer Filburn raised a little wheat on his dairy farm. A portion went to feed livestock, some was ground into flour, some saved for next year’s seed, and some was sold. All of his sales or use of wheat occurred within Ohio. His wheat production exceeded the quota established by the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 and he was fined $117.

Scotus found that his in-state use and sale of wheat affected interstate commerce and was thus subject to federal regulation. A professor of law said the decision couldn’t pass the “giggle test,” and noted that just about anything could therefore be regulated by the feds.

That is exactly what happened.

62 posted on Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:12:17 PM by Jacquerie
Posted 2009-08-20 2:18 PM (#20941 - in reply to #20902) By: EternalVigilance


To: Jacquerie
 
http://www.amazon.com/Dirty-Dozen-Radically-Expanded-Government/dp/...

 

12 USSC cases which greatly expanded to power of government.

63 posted on Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:15:16 PM by nufsed
Posted 2009-08-20 2:24 PM (#20942 - in reply to #20902) By: EternalVigilance


Here is a great YouTube video presentation about Article 1, Section 8 from the folk in the group We Surround Them - Frederick Maryland; the Old Line State, Guardians of the Republic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouZrkIaknBc

NOTE: Be sure to turn up your speakers. The music is perfect for the subject being presented.

 

Posted 2009-08-24 8:37 PM (#21190 - in reply to #20902) By: rbailey




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouZrkIaknBc
Posted 2009-08-25 7:43 AM (#21236 - in reply to #21190) By: Philomena


...and these are the "average" politicians -- to say nothing about those superstar ones such as Barack Obama. How much less likely is he to admit error?
Posted 2009-08-25 7:51 AM (#21237 - in reply to #21236) By: FreeByrd

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

Latest Posts From All Affiliates
Silence, the defense of slavery - gcsteven (23 replies)

Marco Rubio - Savvy (31 replies)

Around the Web News Views at AIPNews.com ... Friday, November 20, 2009 - Savvy (3 replies)

Catholic/Evangelical/Orthodox leaders to release manifesto in Washington today [Romney connection?] - Gregory (9 replies)

Let Rev. Manning be heard! - ALAN KEYES - Philomena (1 replies)

STATE-by-STATE Rally Against Healthcare Reform, Saturday, November 21, 2009 - Savvy (20 replies)

STREET PREACHER ARRESTED AT GAY BAR - Case Dismissed! - nmaureen (0 replies)

Health Care Cost Nightmare - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

Obama: Israel on dangerous path [response from the God of Israel pending] - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

Radical Homosexual Lobby gearing up to pass ENDA - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

Obama Watch at AIPNews.com 11/20/09 - helenm (0 replies)

Politico's commentary on the state of the Tea Party movement - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

Tea Party Rallies in Minot [North Dakota] - EternalVigilance (1 replies)

Audio recording available - AIP's November 19, 2009 America's Summit: Restore The Republic call - SteveSchulin (1 replies)

EVERYONE IS TALKING, WHO IS THIS JIM ANDERSON? [Dr. Keyes visits KS!] - Editor (0 replies)

Glorious Things Are Said Of Him - DAVID JEFFERS - Editor (0 replies)

Founders' Quotes - Editor (90 replies)

Pelosi Won't Say If Bin Laden Has 'Right To Remain Silent' [as the travesty in NY continues] - Editor (4 replies)

Senate confirms controversial judge to federal bench - Editor (0 replies)

Energy-saving bulbs 'get dimmer' - Editor (0 replies)

Married couples face extra tax in Senate health care bill - Editor (0 replies)

Energy independence most important priority - Editor (0 replies)

Belgian PM is first 'president of Europe' - Editor (0 replies)

All that health care reform money - for nothing - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

DAILY PRAYER by Chaplain "Chaps" Gordon James Klingenschmitt - Savvy (35 replies)

A Brief Legislative History of Social Security - larrymwalkerjr (0 replies)

Open Letter: PLEASE JOIN A.I.P. - rapndiamond (2 replies)

Obama Tells Troops: "You guys make a pretty good photo op" - Philomena (6 replies)

Texas - Definition of an Individual - rapndiamond (6 replies)

LifeSiteNews Headlines November 19, 2009 - Philomena (0 replies)

Obama may put Americans under world judges' power - marchingon (0 replies)

I WOULD LIKE TO ISSUE A COMPLAINT - Savvy (5 replies)

America's Summit - Restore the Republic - Every Tues., Thurs., & Sat. - 9 pm Eastern [call info] - Philomena (7 replies)

Frederick County Maryland Under Attack - SteveSchulin (4 replies)

Rev. Manning has had a visit from the Secret Service - Philomena (10 replies)

GOP senator backs off threat to read health bill [Coburn wimps out] - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

California Chaos - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

When Reality Catches up to Rhetoric - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

It is Home Which Decides the Nation - gcsteven (0 replies)

Faith and Action Stages First Live Christmas Nativity Scene in Front of the Supreme Court - nmaureen (0 replies)

Giuliani admits that Bush was soft on Muslims - TomKovach-AIP-TN (0 replies)

VIRUS in the VOTING MACHINES: Tainted Results in NY-23 - Scott_Thomas (2 replies)

Personhood and Personalism Imperative - Philomena (12 replies)

Dr. Manning directly addresses Youtube issues ["Im sick of it! This is worse than Communist China!"] - MaryAnnH (1 replies)

Schools let students seek secret abortions [CA] - EternalVigilance (1 replies)

Till the Revolution Comes [Hon. James David Manning calls Obama "the alleged President"] - EternalVigilance (17 replies)

The first President of Europe - danielh41 (0 replies)

Rev. Manning's Statements & Testament - EternalVigilance (2 replies)

Exclusive: Vulture Political Cartoon by AIP Affiliate Nate Connell - Philomena (10 replies)

Visiting Maj. Nidal Hasan's Hospital - by Chuck Norris - Massachusetts (0 replies)

Personhood and the Ontology of Personalism: - gcsteven (19 replies)

Gary Glenn Responds to Regrettable Mormon Church Decision to Back 'Gay Rights' Laws - EternalVigilance (1 replies)

Hoffman alleges vote fraud in NY-23 - Philomena (2 replies)

CATHOLIC CAMPAIGN FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SCANDAL CONTINUES - Philomena (5 replies)

The BIGGEST LIE Yet - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

NV Life Groups [incl. CP affiliates] in League with Planned Parenthood; Try to Stop Pro-Life Efforts - Gregory (5 replies)

9/11 mom confronts Holder: Why are you doing this? - Philomena (2 replies)

Dance of the death tax continues - 2010 'free ride' anomoly surely to be snuffed - SteveSchulin (0 replies)

Coulter: Congress and the WTC Terrorists - Scott_Thomas (0 replies)

Personhood Florida invites you this Saturday! - EternalVigilance (0 replies)

Why Typical Americans Hate Unions, Part XXXVIII - SonofAsaph (1 replies)

Maryland - Baltimore Mayor trial ends up being about $630 of gift cards - SteveSchulin (0 replies)

Islam: What the West Needs to Know - Philomena (1 replies)

Obama Watch at AIPNews.com 11/19/09 - helenm (0 replies)

NY23-Owens would keep seat, even if Hoffman is found to have won, if GOP-urged 2006 precedent stands - Roundhead (3 replies)

USCCB Approves Strongly-Worded Document Affirming Value of Natural Marriage - Philomena (0 replies)

Maersk Alabama crew repels another pirate attack - this time they had guns - TomKovach-AIP-TN (5 replies)